{
    "success": true,
    "generated_at": "2026-07-30T21:52:05+00:00",
    "payment_reliability": 100,
    "expected_outcome": "very likely to succeed",
    "payment_risk_level": "low",
    "amount_sats": null,
    "amount_sensitivity": {
        "level": "not_provided",
        "score_adjustment": 0,
        "message": "No payment amount provided, so reliability is based on route behavior only."
    },
    "current_route_candidate": {
        "alias": "ACINQ",
        "node_id": "03864ef025fde8fb587d989186ce6a4a186895ee44a926bfc370e2c366597a3f8f",
        "route_score": 97.48,
        "structural_score": 97.48,
        "route_confidence": "high",
        "held_for_snapshots": 12,
        "stability_duration": 12,
        "stability_strength": "strong"
    },
    "dominant_node": {
        "alias": "ACINQ",
        "appearances": 12,
        "dominance_rate_percent": 100,
        "dominance_rate": 100,
        "is_current_leader": true
    },
    "risk_factors": [
        "No major reliability risks detected in the current snapshot window."
    ],
    "why": "Payment reliability is strong because no major instability signals detected, with support from route leadership did not change across the analyzed window and confidence is stable.",
    "why_reasons": [
        "no major instability signals detected",
        "route leadership did not change across the analyzed window",
        "confidence is stable",
        "route score volatility is low",
        "ACINQ has strong short-term stability after 12 snapshot(s)",
        "ACINQ is also the dominant recent node"
    ],
    "explanation": {
        "summary": "Payment reliability is strong because no major instability signals detected, with support from route leadership did not change across the analyzed window and confidence is stable.",
        "primary_reason": "no major instability signals detected",
        "supporting_reasons": [
            "no major instability signals detected",
            "route leadership did not change across the analyzed window",
            "confidence is stable",
            "route score volatility is low",
            "ACINQ has strong short-term stability after 12 snapshot(s)",
            "ACINQ is also the dominant recent node"
        ],
        "caution_signals": [
            "no major instability signals detected"
        ],
        "positive_signals": [
            "route leadership did not change across the analyzed window",
            "confidence is stable",
            "route score volatility is low",
            "ACINQ has strong short-term stability after 12 snapshot(s)",
            "ACINQ is also the dominant recent node"
        ],
        "amount_sensitivity": {
            "level": "not_provided",
            "score_adjustment": 0,
            "message": "No payment amount provided, so reliability is based on route behavior only."
        },
        "confidence_context": {
            "status": "stable",
            "risk_level": "low",
            "confidence_score": 82,
            "structural_score": 97.48,
            "execution_score": 50,
            "stability_score": 89,
            "route_why": "ACINQ appears stable because it aligns with the dominant node and has strong short-term stability across the recent snapshot window. Execution proxy is 50/100 and overall confidence is 82/100.",
            "route_explanation": {
                "summary": "ACINQ looks stable with 82/100 confidence because Route leadership did not change across the last 12 snapshots.",
                "primary_reason": "Route leadership did not change across the last 12 snapshots.",
                "supporting_reasons": [
                    "Route leadership did not change across the last 12 snapshots.",
                    "ACINQ is also the dominant recent node.",
                    "ACINQ owns 100% of recent recommendations, showing concentrated leadership.",
                    "The current leader has strong short-term stability after holding for 12 snapshot(s).",
                    "Route score volatility is low.",
                    "Confidence is stable across the analyzed window."
                ],
                "caution_signals": [],
                "positive_signals": [
                    "Route leadership did not change across the last 12 snapshots.",
                    "ACINQ is also the dominant recent node.",
                    "ACINQ owns 100% of recent recommendations, showing concentrated leadership.",
                    "The current leader has strong short-term stability after holding for 12 snapshot(s).",
                    "Route score volatility is low.",
                    "Confidence is stable across the analyzed window."
                ],
                "movement": {
                    "recent_winner_changes": 0,
                    "previous_winner_changes": 0,
                    "winner_change_delta": 0,
                    "recent_score_volatility": 0.7,
                    "previous_score_volatility": 0.7,
                    "score_volatility_delta": 0,
                    "volatility_direction": "steady"
                },
                "scores": {
                    "confidence_score": 82,
                    "execution_score": 50
                }
            }
        }
    },
    "recommendation": "Payment reliability is strong. ACINQ appears suitable based on current route confidence and recent stability signals.",
    "source_route_confidence": {
        "confidence_score": 82,
        "structural_score": 97.48,
        "execution_score": 50,
        "stability_score": 89,
        "status": "stable",
        "risk_level": "low",
        "why": "ACINQ appears stable because it aligns with the dominant node and has strong short-term stability across the recent snapshot window. Execution proxy is 50/100 and overall confidence is 82/100.",
        "explanation": {
            "summary": "ACINQ looks stable with 82/100 confidence because Route leadership did not change across the last 12 snapshots.",
            "primary_reason": "Route leadership did not change across the last 12 snapshots.",
            "supporting_reasons": [
                "Route leadership did not change across the last 12 snapshots.",
                "ACINQ is also the dominant recent node.",
                "ACINQ owns 100% of recent recommendations, showing concentrated leadership.",
                "The current leader has strong short-term stability after holding for 12 snapshot(s).",
                "Route score volatility is low.",
                "Confidence is stable across the analyzed window."
            ],
            "caution_signals": [],
            "positive_signals": [
                "Route leadership did not change across the last 12 snapshots.",
                "ACINQ is also the dominant recent node.",
                "ACINQ owns 100% of recent recommendations, showing concentrated leadership.",
                "The current leader has strong short-term stability after holding for 12 snapshot(s).",
                "Route score volatility is low.",
                "Confidence is stable across the analyzed window."
            ],
            "movement": {
                "recent_winner_changes": 0,
                "previous_winner_changes": 0,
                "winner_change_delta": 0,
                "recent_score_volatility": 0.7,
                "previous_score_volatility": 0.7,
                "score_volatility_delta": 0,
                "volatility_direction": "steady"
            },
            "scores": {
                "confidence_score": 82,
                "execution_score": 50
            }
        },
        "why_reasons": [
            "Route leadership did not change across the last 12 snapshots.",
            "ACINQ is also the dominant recent node.",
            "ACINQ owns 100% of recent recommendations, showing concentrated leadership.",
            "The current leader has strong short-term stability after holding for 12 snapshot(s).",
            "Route score volatility is low.",
            "Confidence is stable across the analyzed window."
        ],
        "recommendation": "ACINQ is structurally strong, but execution signals are mixed. Treat it as the current structural leader, not a guaranteed best route.",
        "last_updated": "2026-07-30 21:48:03"
    },
    "cache": {
        "hit": false,
        "ttl_seconds": 90
    },
    "api": {
        "name": "payment-reliability",
        "version": "1"
    }
}